zonephantom: (superior)
Tezuka Kunimitsu ([personal profile] zonephantom) wrote2016-10-05 11:38 am

(no subject)

Fuji. It has come to my attention that last night during Atobe's party you made reference to being "concubine to the captain." As far as I am aware, the EAA has not added "concubine" to the officer list. In the future, it would be for the best if you used your correct title, EAA Outreach Officer.

There is no position titled "concubine to the captain" and even if there were such a position, you would not be the one filling it.
oshitari_yuushi: (watching you watch me)

[personal profile] oshitari_yuushi 2016-10-05 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Are you trying to give Atobe a stroke?


[ooc: Post deleted due to better judgement]
shishido_ryou: (close up >.>)

[personal profile] shishido_ryou 2016-10-05 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Ouch. Way to lay the law down, Captain.
shishido_ryou: (cap tch)

[personal profile] shishido_ryou 2016-10-06 07:11 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah but that last line was a slick burn.
oncamera: (wiped)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-06 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
It was too strong a protest. I still hold out hope.
oncamera: (smile)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-06 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I am crushed. It may take me weeks to get over your rejection.
willitblend: (illogical)

[personal profile] willitblend 2016-10-06 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
Even if it were true, shouldn't it be listed as a spousal relationship (as per Regulation 3.4.1.1.3(a) ) rather than a officer title? Regardless, 'concubine' is not acceptable as a partner status by the EAA.
spacekarupin: (sodatime)

[personal profile] spacekarupin 2016-10-06 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Figured.
spacekarupin: (Default)

[personal profile] spacekarupin 2016-10-06 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
That seems to be a good rule of thumb for most people here.
worldofice: (wtf)

[personal profile] worldofice 2016-10-06 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
You were thinking of concubines at my party, Tezuka.
worldofice: (heh)

[personal profile] worldofice 2016-10-06 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
If it weren't for the parties involved, I would suspect your outreach officer to be the informant waiting within your rooms with a camera.

I did not hear you were taking concubines.
worldofice: (behind head)

[personal profile] worldofice 2016-10-07 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
He is an officer, is he not? His quarters are near your own.

Yet, the rumours have clearly spread for you to issue such a public statement.
worldofice: (insight)

[personal profile] worldofice 2016-10-08 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
Who is?

How insightful, Tezuka. What is your plan in such departments?
worldofice: (behind head)

[personal profile] worldofice 2016-10-12 07:43 am (UTC)(link)
Personal inquiries are considered polite between friends, na?
oncamera: (wut)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-06 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
A whole post? Ne, you protest a lot, Tezuka.

How did you find out?
oncamera: (camera)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-06 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Saa.... rebellion from the ranks of the rejected. I didn't know such concerns plagued you so.

Perhaps I said this purely to understand how news travels. Surely you wouldn't block my research as outreach officer?
oncamera: (Tezuka)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-06 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
If not rebellion, then what do you fear would shake your command? The worry of being thought human?

That seems unsupportive.
oncamera: (wut)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-07 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Sometimes your humour surprises me.
nowifi4u: (Default)

[personal profile] nowifi4u 2016-10-07 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Overachiever.
oncamera: (Default)

[personal profile] oncamera 2016-10-08 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
Does that explain Tezuka's excessive protests?